The quality of argumentation and metacognitive reflection in engineering co-Design

Argumentation and metacognitive reflection are required for effective thinking convincing argumentation in engineering co-design. This study investigated students’ their final group reports correlation with the quality of work The groups practiced gained experience ideation product development process during academy-industry collaboration. Iterative theoretical content analysis models were integrated to create a framework identifying acceptable argumentation. results suggest that co-constructed arguments containing claims, reasons, warrants references. Meanwhile, frequency counterarguments, conclusions advanced argument structures, was low. suggests instruction more developed must be carefully into design education foster convincing,